Ranked by the movie.guru score, not vibes. Three Nolan movies, two Prada movies, one De Niro internship. The order will start arguments.
Number one is brand new, and it just bumped a fan favorite.
- 8
Critics loved it. Audiences shrugged. Both are kinda right.
86% on Rotten Tomatoes, but audiences beat only 41% of movies with it. A B CinemaScore and $121.6M worldwide on a reported $80 to 92M budget.
- 7
A cozy crowd pleaser that critics refused to hug.
Critics gave it 59% on Rotten Tomatoes. IMDb voters gave it a 7.1 across 316,101 votes. It turned a reported $35M budget into $194.8M worldwide.
- 6
Ranked below its own sequel, which is a fashion crime.
6.1 here versus the sequel's 6.3. But 575,204 IMDb voters have weighed in, and it turned a reported $35 to 41M budget into $326.6M worldwide.
- 5
The sequel cashed in. Bigger, louder, not better.
$693.5M worldwide on a reported $100M budget and an A minus CinemaScore. Still, IMDb has it at 6.3, a full 0.7 below the original.
- 4
Critics were lukewarm. Audiences cried into their popcorn anyway.
Critics beat just 58% of movies with it. Audiences beat 83%. An A CinemaScore and $442.8M worldwide for a movie that's basically all singing.
- 3
Fans call it her best. The numbers say third.
8.7 on IMDb from 2,622,703 voters, the highest on this list. A B plus CinemaScore and a 73% on Rotten Tomatoes dragged it down. Docking error.
- 2
Good, not great. The audience score is doing heavy lifting.
Audiences beat 94% of movies with it, critics only 65%. Metacritic says 64. $1.09B worldwide is a lot of people agreeing to skip the plot holes.
- 1
Her best movie is the newest one. Fight me.
A 9.5 movie.guru score, 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, 88 on Metacritic and $1.79B worldwide. Critics and audiences both beat 96% of movies. Guru's Take is 8.6, but fine.
Change my mind. Rank these from most to least rewatchable. Wrong answers only.
$461.87 says you scroll straight to the comments to defend Interstellar.
Share it: X | Facebook | Copy link
Current mood: ready to fight about it