Keaton has played a bat, a bird, a ghost and a vulture. The data ranked them. Movie guru has opinions about the data.
#1 has no cape, no wings, no stripes. The Batman crowd will riot.
- 8
Keaton's in it. The Minions don't need him.
$1.16 billion worldwide on a $74M reported budget, and the guru still gave it a 4.4. Yellow jelly beans carried this, not the cast.
- 7
Underrated, and Keaton is why you rewatch it.
78% on Rotten Tomatoes but a B− CinemaScore. Critics got the joke, audiences shrugged. The guru's 6.9 sides with the critics.
- 6
Fun sequel, and the 5.9 is honest.
$452M worldwide on a reported $99 to 100M budget. Keaton is a blast, the plot is a junk drawer, and a B+ CinemaScore agrees.
- 5
Better than the first Batman. Fight me.
The guru gives Returns a 7.8 and Batman a 6.8. DeVito and Pfeiffer bring the weird, and it still pulled $266.9M worldwide.
- 4
Nicholson's movie. Keaton is a guest in his own cape.
Audiences beat 87% of movies here, critics only 67%. $411.6M worldwide on a $48M reported budget. Iconic, a little overpraised.
- 3
His best performance, and it isn't close.
Metacritic 87 and a guru 8.8. Keaton playing a washed-up superhero actor is the most meta casting of the decade. Only $103.2M worldwide.
- 2
Marvel's best villain is a working guy, not a space god.
$881M worldwide and an A CinemaScore. Keaton out-acts the whole movie, which is why the guru's 7.8 trails its 8.5 score.
- 1
Keaton's best movie has no cape and no makeup.
97% on Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic 93, a 9.6 movie.guru score. Quiet, careful, devastating. Only $45.1M domestic, so most of you skipped it.
Change my mind. Rank these from best to worst Keaton. Wrong answers only.
$1,089 says you type "Batman should be #1" before you finish scrolling.
Share it: X | Facebook | Copy link
Current mood: ready to fight about it